These are the articles by Barely Streetable on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube. A lifetime enthusiast and member of WAJ and MPG automotive journalist organizations. I've attended AMG, Audi, BMW, Bondurant, Exotics Racing, KTM X-Bow and SRT schools and hot lapped dozens of cars and drag raced at multiple tracks in 5 states. I also hate HOV lanes. Motto: Fast cars, slow bikes
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Infiniti G37 Coupe Review and Test Drive
In the $40,000+ price range, it’s hard to make a bad choice when buying a new vehicle. If you’re looking for a sporty and luxurious coupe with usable rear seats you really can’t go wrong. Even if you pick on styling alone, you won’t make a bad decision. The G37 Coupe from Infiniti has great curves that make a convincing case.
Exterior
Spending time with this car in black and studying the styling, I came across a realization. Make some minor changes such as eliminating the chrome, round the tail lights and add some yellow prancing horse badges and it could easily pass for a grand tourer from Ferrari. That is how well the lines on this car look in person. The same could be said in the 4th (and last) generation Toyota Supra from 1993 to 1998.
Details like the headlights, hood line and front fenders are exquisite. Fit and finish are exemplary with excellent fitment of the body panels. Even the standard 18” rims look proportionate in this day of 19s and 20s on many models.
Interior
The keyless entry and push button start combined with exterior push button locking is very convenient. It takes a while to remember to stop reaching for the key to start it. Its proximity technology is so accurate it can detect what side of the car the key holder is standing by only allowing that door to unlock. The exterior push button trunk feature is nice as well.
The other favorite part is the rear back-up camera. A proximity sensor usually makes for a messy back bumper. The camera makes life so easy, not just due to the rear visibility but also keeping a lookout for shorter obstacles like curbs, rocks, shrubs, etc. Using graphics to trace the path of the vehicle makes for great visualization of the intended path. As mentioned in the Audi A5 review, the fisheye lens means a broad view in case of cross traffic in a parking lot.
The memory driver’s seat is very comfortable and the ergonomics are excellent. It’s a little bit of a reach for the seatbelt but that is common in coupes. The dashboard display is beautiful at night with great colors. It does take some time to learn the intricacies of the integrated navigation and audio systems but that is expected. The selector dial on the dash is a little bit of a reach instead of where the arm falls naturally in the center console area like Audis and BMWs. If the passenger reaches for it, an accidental press of the hazard button has happened several times.
The wood dash option looks great but is dark. The brushed aluminum has a sporty element with a nice contrast. For 2010, the aluminum has a slightly different finish and there iPod hook-up is more integrated instead of an adaptor cable needed. Also the heated seats have switches instead of dials. The owner reports moving things to the passenger seat (like a purse…) may turn a dial accidentally, hence the change to switches.
Despite telescoping and tilt steering (which moves the driver’s dashboard display), it could offer slightly more downward adjustment.
Thinking about the MSRP of the mid-40s and what could be changed in terms of upgrades are few. More power via a V-8 is one way provided the weight gain and front-to-rear balance isn’t altered too much. If the seatbelts were structurally integrated into the seats, that would solve the need to reach or twist to grab the seat belt. How much of a weight gain it would take would be interesting to know, along with crash testing, etc.
Driving Experience
Driving the car is so effortless. The 7-speed automatic means the car always seems to be in the right gear with no dead spots or lag. It’s very smooth with no hint of the commonly reported vibration or harshness of the 370Z especially with the manual transmission. This particular model is not the “Sport” model. The Sport model brings paddle shifters, a limited slip differential, larger brakes and a stiffer suspension. For daily driving this isn’t necessary because the ride is so good.
The brakes take a light touch, almost too light. It takes some getting used to. The engine response is a little jumpy or touchy as if the tune for the fuel delivery is a little sudden. Revised engine mapping or throttle programming with the drive-by-wire system would easily solve this. I can’t imagine it’s simply a function of the 3.7 liter engine being tuned to 330hp.
Acceleration is more than adequate but barely qualifies for a helmet at the drag strip. Enough for traffic and decent mileage but it’s not a racer. It’s so nice that you don’t care whether or not you get beat by the kid next to you in a Mustang or Camaro. Because it just doesn’t matter when you’re rolling in a sweet combination of art and jewelry.
Monday, November 29, 2010
All Wheel Drive Toyota Supra? Ask Rob About Cars
Hey Car Guy,
Can you tell me if the Supra came in an all wheel drive configuration?
Thanks,
JH, Seattle, WA
Thank you for writing, JH. The Toyota Supra was never offered by Toyota in an AWD configuration although a search online reveals some aftermarket attempts. The Supra was sold in the United States from 1979 to 1998 with the 4th generation (MKIV) from '93 to '98 having the most notoriety. However there was an AWD Toyota Celica sold in 1988 to 1993 which spanned two different generations. It featured a 190hp turbocharged 4-cylinder engine and saw success in World Rally Championship racing before Mitsubishi and Subaru were competitors.
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it!
Continue reading on Examiner.com: All Wheel Drive Toyota Supra? Ask Rob About Cars - San Jose Autos | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/autos-in-san-jose/all-wheel-drive-toyota-supra-ask-rob-about-cars#ixzz1CTG1tbPd
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
End of Summer Musings in the Auto Industry
Now that fall is here after a busy summer, there are some thoughts that have come to mind that are worth sharing.
Incorrect transmission references still abound. Industry members and journalists still refer to automated manual transmissions as an automatic transmission. An “automatic transmission” definition should not change. It’s a transmission that uses fluid to transmit power until a physical lock-up occurs. An automated manual, single or dual clutch uses actual clutches for a physical connection for power transfer at all speeds. They are distinctly different but neither one has a clutch pedal and both can be driven without manually selecting gears.
A Saleen S7R won its class at LeMans for the first time and it was the last running of the GT-1 class. This is quite a momentous event after 10 years of gallant attempts. This time the usually dominant Corvette C6-Rs lost and note they are no longer factory backed. The non-factory backed Aston Martins lost as well. AutoWeek magazine, now published every 2 weeks and called AW, referred to the S7 as a muscle car. It is not a muscle car, nor has it ever been. It is a pure sports car, exotic, light and mid-engine but from the United States. The Wiki page for the S7 has some fascinating statistics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saleen_S7
BMW may have a low horsepower rating versus the real number. Road & Track recently tested the 400hp twin-turbo BMW 750i in a comparison test vs. the Lexus LS 460. The 6-speed automatic, 4600lb BMW ran a quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds at 108mph. Just like the 335i, this car seems to be underrated. I would guess it’s closer to 460hp, perhaps more. If it was really 400hp, it would need to weigh around 4,000lbs to post numbers like that. Think Pontiac G8 GXP as a great benchmark. http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/comparison/2010-bmw-750i-vs.-2010-lexus-ls-460-sport
The 60-130mph test is gaining in popularity. The Battle Of The Supercars, a fun show on Speed TV, tested modified muscle cars in a 60-130mph test. The 800hp+ Ford GT500 and Camaro both ran times significantly slower than they should have. Reason being is they started timing from a standing 60mph start. Better to start below 50mph my source tells me. Also Road & Track just did a similar test but from 80-130mph for production sports cars and their racing counterparts. Don’t know why that starting speed was chosen but I would say a precedent has already been set for the 60mph starting speed. http://www.examiner.com/autos-in-san-jose/new-performance-standard-of-60mph-to-130mph-replacing-the-quarter-mile-drag-race
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Volvo S60 Wins Speed GT Championship and Crow still tastes okay
In April 2009, I predicted the Volvo S60 in the Speed GT series was essentially a waste of time. For the 2009 season they did okay, but Brandon Davis won the driver’s championship with his heavily modified (even for racing) Ford Mustang FR500C. Porsche took home the manufacturer’s championship. Now for the 2010 season the Volvo won the drivers’ (Randy Pobst) and manufacturers’ championships.
I must give credit and congratulations to the Volvo S60, Randy Pobst, Andy Pilgrim, K-Pax Racing, 3R Racing/Auto for chassis development, Mahle for the engines and Weismann for the transmissions. A team effort that resulted in wins over the proven masters of road racing. Top drivers Randy and Andy could not have done it without excellent equipment and vice versa.
These all-wheel drive cars really did a great job this past season. I wonder if AWD will be banned for the GT class after this success or will the S60 be back? A ruling like that is not unheard of although I think Porsche’s 911 GT3 Hybrid race car may have earned an exemption at some point. So what now for Geely owned Volvo? Have you noticed the new commercials for the 300hp S60? It’s “naughty” with 300hp and 325ft lbs torque. http://www.volvocars.com/us/all-cars/volvo-s60/Pages/default.aspx It’s the same performance envelope from 7 years ago when Car & Driver tested a past generation: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/03q3/volvo_s60r_awd-road_test
Volvo should get more aggressive and use the Speed GT title in their ads. I also think Volvo should offer an “R” version making 350hp or even 400hp to capitalize on the win. Currently 300hp, AWD and 3800lbs is great for a daily driver, and “naughty “ is probably appropriate, but it’s time to spice it up. How about “Bad Boy” or “Champion Edition” or Porsche eater? Viper killer? Corvette slayer? Pretty comical, I know. Kudos to Volvo and the rest that were directly involved, now capitalize on it. BBQ’d crow on the grill isn’t so bad.
_____
Readers: Be sure to check out the Tuner Grand Prix at Laguna Seca on October 22nd-24th. The K-Pax 3R Volvo S-60R is in the unlimited class. My prediction is with no weight or boost restrictions, it just may take the overall win in this event too. http://www.globaltunergp.com/index.php
____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Audi Q5 3.2 Test Drive and Review - Still Sublime
The 2010 Audi Q5 is another example of excellence in Audi engineering. As typical Audi, the interior is top notch. Granted most SUVs are not exactly exciting to drive so they better be easy and comfortable. This one isn’t for performance or off-road capability but rather practicality. Not too big, but just right.
Equipped with the 3.2 liter V-6 producing 270 horsepower, it’s quite adequate for daily driving and the owner reports the trip computer states 26mpg at 70-80mph cruising. Audi states a 0-60mph time of 6.7 seconds as well. It does require premium gas but you pay for what you get. I immediately think of some popular V-6s that are 3.5 liters or larger before having that horsepower mark.
It’s really about utility and the automatic rear hatch has a height adjustment for ease of closing. It also has a nice cargo cover and very well thought-out floor plan.
The 3.2 Premium Plus package includes the 2-panel Panorama sunroof, one of the most distinctive features. The rear panel is fixed but the front offers a nice large opening for fresh air. It has a perforated power sunshade as well that isn’t taut. After all, it is pretty large. What is a neat feature is the shade can be closed with the roof open so that you still get the airflow but not the sun beating down on you. There will be some flutter from the shade, however.
While reaching for my pen that fell on the side of the seat, I discovered the button for lumbar support. This one had all the great features of the A5 I reviewed including the integrated navigation, satellite radio and iPod controls in the fantastic MMI multi-media interface. One negative feedback point from the owner is the 3-D view of the navigation system is disconcerting in dense downtown areas with high-rise buildings. Take a look at the Interior Link below and click on photo #5 supplied by Audi. If you use a navigation system currently, you might relate to this complaint.
Driving the SUV…wait, Audi calls this a crossover. Well that really means it’s a lifted station wagon with more headroom and taller cargo area. The other “crossovers” like the Honda Accord (see my San Jose Auto Show article and photos) are just lifted wagons. Alright, so back to the driving impression. Typical Audi turbine-like smoothness. The 6-speed automatic works very well.
The mirrors, while large and excellent for side/rear visibility blocked my vision when turning. Then again, not everyone’s eyes are in the same place when seated. What was also noticed when turning was somewhat heavy off-center steering feel.
The ride is firm yet smooth, a common description with many premium cars. When in the market for a mid-size SUV yet desiring luxury features, the Q5, especially the V-6, offers all the benefits of a sedan, isn’t oversized and offers excellent cargo capacity. Practical, rather efficient and excellent quality.
Audi USA website, click on picture#5
http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/models/q5/explore/exterior_design.html#source=http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/models/q5/explore/interior_design.html&container=page
Audi A5 Review and Test Drive:
http://www.examiner.com/autos-in-san-jose/audi-a5-quattro-coupe-review-and-test-drive-sublime-perfection
Sunday, September 19, 2010
2011 Ford Mustang GT Automatic Soft Launch? Ask Rob About Cars
Read your 2011 Ford Mustang GT Test Drive And Overview on insidemusclecars.com (also published here: http://www.examiner.com/autos-in-san-jose/2011-ford-mustang-gt-automatic-test-drive-and-overview )
Best article yet I have read. I am a first time muscle car buyer and am 46 years old. I got the 2011 Mustang GT/CS automatic. Any suggestions for a first time buyer/driver? I tried your slammin it to the floor at 20mph and anything above 60mph and it sure is fun. I am a little disappointed in the take off from a dead stop
Thanks Jim
_______
Hi Jim,
I wish I could take credit for that article but I'm glad you liked it.
Congratulations on your purchase. I take it you're looking for
suggestions for a quicker "launch" from a dead stop? You could look
at the softness off the line as a benefit too. A fast car like that
can easily overwhelm the tires and you end up spinning instead of
moving forward. Therefore the benefit can actually be is that your
"launches" can be very consistent which many cannot claim.
However if your tires are warm and the surface can handle more power
than just hitting the gas, a "brake torque" will allow you to start
with a higher rpm, bringing the engine into the powerband more
quickly. This is only when racing, not a daily practice by any means.
The technique is left-foot braking and holding the car in place while
giving it some gas. Do not do this for very long as it can overheat
the transmission. Per the previous article, this seems to help quite a bit.
In the meantime, scan dragtimes.com and the various Mustang forums for
owners with automatic transmissions on street tires (versus drag
radials or slicks) and see what kind of 60ft times they are hitting at
the dragstrip and the techniques they used. If you're seeing 1.9x
seconds, it's pretty good. Anything below that is great. 2.0 seconds
is decent, but anything higher than that is really a soft launch.
Just doing a cursory search, it's difficult to find many quarter mile
results for automatics, let alone the manuals.
There is one owner who has timeslips showing 12-second runs at
114-115mph with 2.0 60fts but that trap speed is very suspect. I'll
go on record saying that a "stock" '11 GT Automatic will never repeat
this unless the timing lights are out of calibration or
malfunctioning. Many experienced drag racers on line are of this
opinion.
Besides technique, some custom engine tuning and intake and exhaust
modifications might help the response off the line. However, it is
that critical moment from a dead stop to rolling is the key and the
60ft is a great measurement. In other words, even though your head
isn't jerked back right off the line, if the car is cutting 1.9 60fts
or better on street tires, or even 2.0 60fts every time, you're doing just
fine.
Not everyone has the time or desire to go to the dragstrip however. A
fun device like a Gtech Pro http://www.gtechpro.com/ or Vbox
http://www.vboxusa.com/ can measure 0-60mph times well enough to tell
you how good your launch is as well.
Please feel free ask any other questions, I hope this helped. Thank
you Jim and have fun!
Rob
_______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Dodge Caliber SXT Review and Test Drive
When driving a car that is new to you, don’t you want to like it? Unfortunately with the 2009 Dodge Caliber SXT, that wasn’t the case. If you have one, don’t read further. I just can’t recommend this vehicle as much as I was hoping to. I don’t want to offend owners, but some people buy a car to be a little different and if they are fairly comfortable, they are happy. Others demand more from what is typically their second largest purchase in their life.
Having driven it for several hundred miles over the course of a few days a number of issues made themselves known. I had issues with the interior , ride, engine, transmission, etc.
The ride was rather floaty with side-to-side head-toss over bumps and dips. In other words the motion would rock the vehicle and that movement is transmitted to the least “secured” part of the body with a weight on top of it – the neck.
Excessive road noise from the tires filled the cabin. When the cargo area is shared with the passenger compartment without a bulkhead or folding seats as a divider, sound management is important. It was loud on the highway and I found it fatiguing.
The steering wheel sat too low interfering with the legs. Oddly, the dashboard actually slopes up towards the windshield where it meets with the upward sloping high hood-line. Adjusting the seat for comfortable position to the steering wheel and pedals meant the exterior view was compromised. With the windshield being so far from the front occupants along with the seating position, the A-pillars caused blind spots that were disconcerting.
This is not a vehicle for those that make frequent trips in nice clothes. The seats had such an abrasive fabric they would wear out a nice pair of slacks rather quickly. If you’re a traveling salesperson and are stuck with this car, buy a seat cover.
It has a continuously variable transmission which is annoying for anything other than casual acceleration. Otherwise it’s buzzy and seems as if it is continuously slipping. A common complaint among CVTs. I don’t find it appealing.
The gauges were easy to read, the radio was fine and the AC cooled nicely. However the vents can’t be moved side to side. I can’t tell you how ridiculous this is. Why in the world is this even allowed in a production car? Maybe it’s marketed to those who hardly ever turn on the air conditioning versus those that are hot all the time. Guess which group the author falls in?
Interior storage is clever. The phone storage is handy and a two level glove box is pretty neat too. A binnacle on the left might be suitable for a Bluetooth earpiece but that is about it. Definitely not for change or for your second cell phone (like personal vs. company issued). The middle storage binnacle has a lower edge that reveals the production tolerances are just okay.
17” wheels and tires were a nice addition. But overall the styling still struck me as odd, related to the Chevy Aztec.
The one thing that I stuck with me more than anything else and for the longest time is the granite-like, narrow inside door edge. If you like to put your elbow up when you drive, it will hurt within moments. It was horrible. I didn’t even put it in my notes and it’s still burned in my memory.
In all fairness, the Caliber is available with some neat features. See the link below for a window sticker. If you’re shopping for a Dodge Caliber, and these things matter to you, buyer beware. If you don’t mind it, you like the styling, its functionality suits you, then go for it.
http://www.dodge.com/hostc/getWindowStickerPdf.do?vin=1B3CB4HA4AD546307
________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Email me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Pebble Beach Concours D'elegance: Exotics and Events Outside the Shows
My favorite part of the Monterey Weekend Of Automobiles (MWOA!) is actually the cars outside of the Concours D'elegance that are primarily featured on the day of the show. Sometimes you get a peak a day or two before. Others are seen at the various auctions.
The ones I've wanted to see for a long time in the past year or so were present: Ferrari 458 Italia, 599 GTO and the one and only P540 Superfast Aperta based on the 599 GTB. Also a Bugatti Veyron Super Sport, McLaren MP4-12C, Porsche 918 Spyder, 911 Turbo S, Cadillac CTS-V Coupe, and others. Some surprises were there as well such as the gorgeous Morgan EvaGT and the Lotus Evora Cup GT4 which has the horsepower output the production Evora desperately needs.
The Ferrari display just outside the Concours is up the ramp from the shops near the main entrance. The display was wonderful and deserved a higher traffic location. Some even missed it. The Italia was a very nice dark blue and of course the GTO was red. The only P540 in existence, part of the Ferrari customization program is gold colored.
The Bugatti, an even darker blue-black was especially understated. Even the McLaren was the wrong color, silver, and looks like a small car, not a wide sports car. An interesting perception, I'll be curious to see other colors on the road, hopefully.
The CTS-V is "V-rated" just like the sedan version. Wheels, brakes, hood and grill distinguish it from the standard coupe just like the sedan. The rear end just looks too disproportionately large. A comment overheard was it looks just like some simple trapezoidal shape. There is a very strange cut line near the door touch pad opening that looks like a little square filler instead of being part of the body work.
The Porsche Spyder is simply outrageous. A shorter, more curvy looking ancestor of the Carrera GT, it was also the absolutely wrong color, somewhat of a muted beige silver that didn't do it justice.
The Morgan EvaGT was a stunner. Elements of the 3rd generation Corvette could be seen but with European supercar lines. It's curves were R-rated, not suitable for those with delicate sensitivities. Really, this car is like a Frederick's of Hollywood model lounging in her lingerie on the putting green.
Jaguar's weekend kick-off event featured the remaining 12 of the 16 XK-SS Roadsters at the entrance to the party. An impressive historical sight while all their stunningly elegant models were on display. Race car driver Roberto Guerrero was even one of the very friendly product specialists. The food and large room dedicated for desserts was far more memorable than the fun dance floor.
The auctions offered some other stunners as well such as some gorgeous Ferrari's at the RM Auction held at the Portola Hotel & Spa and Monterey Conference Center. In fact, the top seller was a Ferrari that sold for $4,620,000. Now the auction charges $40 per person just to view the cars and even more to attend. Considering the crowds at night, this is a necessary but unfortunate fee.
MWOA is a spectacular time of year. Be sure to mark your calendar for the third weekend in August and be prepared to check off all the "greats" you read and see in the magazines, on Top Gear and You Tube all year.
Monday, August 23, 2010
Pebble Beach Concours D'elegance 2010: Stunning Again
It never fails; the 3rd weekend in August is special for a reason and Sunday in particular. Its one thing to see incredible factory production cars, quite another to see examples of greatness from decades or even a century ago that will never be produced again. Cars you've never heard of, never knew existed, and now never can afford. Just to see them up close is a special treat. This year is the 60th annual event and it has raised over 14 million dollars for local, national and international charities. www.pebblebeachconcours.net/
Buy tickets before the show to avoid the same-day mark-up and lines. When you arrive, be sure to park near the posted bus stops and not in a location where there just happens to be cars. Otherwise, it's a long walk to the next stop. Traffic management is pretty good, even arriving late works out well. Be sure to wear walking shoes and even when overcast you can get a sunburn.
The paintwork is flawless, the curves R-rated, the bright work perfectly reflective…you get the point. This year featured Alfa Romeo, Pierce-Arrow, Jaguar and the designs of Ghia. Additionally the Lakesters, Bonneville racers, past Indy cars and antique motorcycles added additional variety.
Even if the overall shape of the car looks identical, take a look at the multiple details inside and out. Rolling sculpture and jewelry before true mass production and aerodynamically perfect details took over. Read the signs in front of them, sometimes their history is also fascinating it's a story you can see in your mind's eye.
The artwork in the tent on the grounds is breathtaking although this year had fewer exhibitors than a few years ago. The food is good, service is excellent and the clothing/memorabilia items are top quality.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger attended again and Jay Leno is always bitingly funny announcing the raffle. Edward Herrmann always does a great job announcing the show. Being a fan, I thanked him Thursday night for his contributions and film work at the Credit Suisse www.credit-suisse.com/us/en/ cocktail reception.
Other celebrity attendees were seen as well. A new Orange County Housewife and Brittny Gastineau (Mark's daughter) were spotted by my Lovely Navigator. Yes, the cars were that good. But who is really important is the panel of judges.
The judging panel is a who's who in the automotive world. It is an honor and privilege to attend an event where they gather to assess the rolling artwork. Check out the list here: www.pebblebeachconcours.net/pages/3042/index.htm
Buy tickets before the show to avoid the same-day mark-up and lines. When you arrive, be sure to park near the posted bus stops and not in a location where there just happens to be cars. Otherwise, it's a long walk to the next stop. Traffic management is pretty good, even arriving late works out well. Be sure to wear walking shoes and even when overcast you can get a sunburn.
The paintwork is flawless, the curves R-rated, the bright work perfectly reflective…you get the point. This year featured Alfa Romeo, Pierce-Arrow, Jaguar and the designs of Ghia. Additionally the Lakesters, Bonneville racers, past Indy cars and antique motorcycles added additional variety.
Even if the overall shape of the car looks identical, take a look at the multiple details inside and out. Rolling sculpture and jewelry before true mass production and aerodynamically perfect details took over. Read the signs in front of them, sometimes their history is also fascinating it's a story you can see in your mind's eye.
The artwork in the tent on the grounds is breathtaking although this year had fewer exhibitors than a few years ago. The food is good, service is excellent and the clothing/memorabilia items are top quality.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger attended again and Jay Leno is always bitingly funny announcing the raffle. Edward Herrmann always does a great job announcing the show. Being a fan, I thanked him Thursday night for his contributions and film work at the Credit Suisse www.credit-suisse.com/us/en/ cocktail reception.
Other celebrity attendees were seen as well. A new Orange County Housewife and Brittny Gastineau (Mark's daughter) were spotted by my Lovely Navigator. Yes, the cars were that good. But who is really important is the panel of judges.
The judging panel is a who's who in the automotive world. It is an honor and privilege to attend an event where they gather to assess the rolling artwork. Check out the list here: www.pebblebeachconcours.net/pages/3042/index.htm
The automobiles that are not entered in the show are stunning as well stay tuned for an upcoming article on the cars outside the Concours, especially if you're an enthusiast of the latest generation of exotics.
The Pebble Beach Concours D'elegance is a must-see for any auto enthusiast. Even if your tastes don't towards the pre-war classics, the variety, ambiance, presentation, people watching and overall experience should be on your must-do automotive wish list.
______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Concorso Italiano 2010: Returning to Greatness
Recovering from the miserable airport facility a couple years ago, Friday August 13th, 2010 was the second year at the Laguna Seca Golf Ranch in Monterey, CA. As always, there’s a little bit of magic in the air when you have so many exotic cars in one location. Throw in some sunshine, food, excellent vendors and a sprinkling of celebrities and it makes you want to lay down on grass and wiggle a little just like a dog. Okay, maybe that’s just me.
Always a recommendation is to go ahead and enter your car in the corral, assuming it’s not an Italian make. There are usually two reasons for this and this year now four reasons. First, it’s a bargain. It covers the cost of two people for the price of one. Second, you can’t beat the parking. Anytime you can picnic at your car in the middle of a car show on a golf course, do it. The more important reasons became apparent this weekend.
The traffic back-up from eastbound Highway 68 was nearly five miles long and it took an hour. Make sure you have gas, food, drink, air conditioning, satellite radio, my Lovely Navigator (go find your own), etc. Some fellow enthusiasts started later than us and arrived earlier because they registered their car.
The corral participation was particularly lacking.
Reason number four is they need more cars in the non-Italian section. So what if the Audi and BMWs look like an earth-tone parking lot at the mall. Pop the hoods and roll down the windows. Those two marquees along with Porsche and Corvette had much better participation at the hot, dusty, loud and fun American LeMans races at Laguna Seca. Go figure.
The Alpha Romeo section is finally highlighted by the 8C, a gorgeous car from any angle. Pantera never changes but the drivetrains can sure look intimidating. Shame on any owners that hide them.
Ferrari featured a gathering of F-40s which look particularly mean and full-race ready. Two F-50s were highlights, along with a black Enzo. Obviously missing was a red 458 Italia but there was a black one with oversized 22”wheels and opinions vary on that… An SP1 – the first from the Ferrari Portfolio Program, based on an F430 was present too. There was a yellow Ferrari under a car cover, possibly 550-based. What's up with that?
Separated by some excellent vendor offerings such as clothes, accessories, fan collectibles, etc was Lamborghini. Exotic car personified, it was a treat to see at least two LP670 SVs, LP640s, Murcielagos, Gallardos, Diablos, Countachs and a Miura or two. A race-prepped Gallardo was started and revved for a bit, adding the required soundtrack to the day.
The grandstand area offered a wonderful assortment of live entertainment a fashion show and fascinating commentary on the various vehicles driven to the stage and presented. Celebrities sighted include Paul Mitchell and Adam Corolla. As mentioned, once in a while a car starts up, starts tossing revs, and it’s a glorious sound.
Overall it’s a great show and hopefully will recover to be what it once was. If you love Italian sports and exotic cars, this show is a must-see no matter what. Meet the owners, see the cars and love it all.
Always a recommendation is to go ahead and enter your car in the corral, assuming it’s not an Italian make. There are usually two reasons for this and this year now four reasons. First, it’s a bargain. It covers the cost of two people for the price of one. Second, you can’t beat the parking. Anytime you can picnic at your car in the middle of a car show on a golf course, do it. The more important reasons became apparent this weekend.
The traffic back-up from eastbound Highway 68 was nearly five miles long and it took an hour. Make sure you have gas, food, drink, air conditioning, satellite radio, my Lovely Navigator (go find your own), etc. Some fellow enthusiasts started later than us and arrived earlier because they registered their car.
The corral participation was particularly lacking.
Reason number four is they need more cars in the non-Italian section. So what if the Audi and BMWs look like an earth-tone parking lot at the mall. Pop the hoods and roll down the windows. Those two marquees along with Porsche and Corvette had much better participation at the hot, dusty, loud and fun American LeMans races at Laguna Seca. Go figure.
The Alpha Romeo section is finally highlighted by the 8C, a gorgeous car from any angle. Pantera never changes but the drivetrains can sure look intimidating. Shame on any owners that hide them.
Ferrari featured a gathering of F-40s which look particularly mean and full-race ready. Two F-50s were highlights, along with a black Enzo. Obviously missing was a red 458 Italia but there was a black one with oversized 22”wheels and opinions vary on that… An SP1 – the first from the Ferrari Portfolio Program, based on an F430 was present too. There was a yellow Ferrari under a car cover, possibly 550-based. What's up with that?
Separated by some excellent vendor offerings such as clothes, accessories, fan collectibles, etc was Lamborghini. Exotic car personified, it was a treat to see at least two LP670 SVs, LP640s, Murcielagos, Gallardos, Diablos, Countachs and a Miura or two. A race-prepped Gallardo was started and revved for a bit, adding the required soundtrack to the day.
The grandstand area offered a wonderful assortment of live entertainment a fashion show and fascinating commentary on the various vehicles driven to the stage and presented. Celebrities sighted include Paul Mitchell and Adam Corolla. As mentioned, once in a while a car starts up, starts tossing revs, and it’s a glorious sound.
Overall it’s a great show and hopefully will recover to be what it once was. If you love Italian sports and exotic cars, this show is a must-see no matter what. Meet the owners, see the cars and love it all.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
BMW 318is - Better Mileage With Gearing? Ask Rob About Cars
Hi Rob,
Great articles and photos, thanks so much ,
I have a 1994 BMW 318is. It gets great gas mileage and would love to get even better mileage . The rear end (3rd) member locked up when I first got the car, so I found a deal on a 325 axles and rear end , put it in never changed any gears do you know if the 325 is different than the 318is both were manual transmissions. Should I leave well enough alone ?
Thanks,
FAN
Hello Fan and thank you!
I found this excellent website that lists a LOT of BMW gear ratios, perhaps all of them: http://www.bokchoys.com/differential/GearRatios.htm
It seems that you now have a less-aggressive final drive ratio of 3.15 vs. 3.45. So if you like your mileage and the acceleration is adequate, I would leave it alone and congratulate yourself on a fuel saving modification.
I wouldn't suggest trying anything numerically lower than 3.15 such as the 2.93, even if you can find it. My concern would be inadequate acceleration with the 4-cylinder engine. This would mean using higher revs and consuming more gas, effectively negating your intended result. Also, it may mean using a higher gear for cruising at certain speeds and poor acceleration in 5th gear. If you know anyone that has done it, be sure to write back and share!
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Great articles and photos, thanks so much ,
I have a 1994 BMW 318is. It gets great gas mileage and would love to get even better mileage . The rear end (3rd) member locked up when I first got the car, so I found a deal on a 325 axles and rear end , put it in never changed any gears do you know if the 325 is different than the 318is both were manual transmissions. Should I leave well enough alone ?
Thanks,
FAN
Hello Fan and thank you!
I found this excellent website that lists a LOT of BMW gear ratios, perhaps all of them: http://www.bokchoys.com/differential/GearRatios.htm
It seems that you now have a less-aggressive final drive ratio of 3.15 vs. 3.45. So if you like your mileage and the acceleration is adequate, I would leave it alone and congratulate yourself on a fuel saving modification.
I wouldn't suggest trying anything numerically lower than 3.15 such as the 2.93, even if you can find it. My concern would be inadequate acceleration with the 4-cylinder engine. This would mean using higher revs and consuming more gas, effectively negating your intended result. Also, it may mean using a higher gear for cruising at certain speeds and poor acceleration in 5th gear. If you know anyone that has done it, be sure to write back and share!
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Toyota FJ Opinion? Ask Rob About Cars
Brandon from Brandon, FL writes:
I am always in the market for a new ride I like the Accord. But I really enjoy a Crossover-SUV with the higher up feeling. But there are none that are in my price range so for the past year I've been stuck. But with my warranty now up I am back to searching for a good weekend deal in the paper. What do you think of the Toyota FJ Cruiser, black on black with dual exhaust? It has a good sporty look to it. I also am not really worried about gas I don't drive much at all. My current ride gets about 16/21 mpg city/highway.
Brandon,
The Toyota FJ is a nice beefy, ride. Toyota reliability and distinctive, retro styling are nice touches. In fact, my sister really wants one! It definitely has off-road intentions so that part might be wasted in your neck of the woods. There is nothing wrong with that if gas consumption isn't a concern.
I suggest two things though. If you tend have rear seat passengers or cargo, try climbing in and out and see what you think in terms of access. Second, take the car into a crowded parking lot and park it between cars and back it up a few times. See if the visibility is acceptable for the daily driving you'll be doing. Good luck in your search!
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
I am always in the market for a new ride I like the Accord. But I really enjoy a Crossover-SUV with the higher up feeling. But there are none that are in my price range so for the past year I've been stuck. But with my warranty now up I am back to searching for a good weekend deal in the paper. What do you think of the Toyota FJ Cruiser, black on black with dual exhaust? It has a good sporty look to it. I also am not really worried about gas I don't drive much at all. My current ride gets about 16/21 mpg city/highway.
Brandon,
The Toyota FJ is a nice beefy, ride. Toyota reliability and distinctive, retro styling are nice touches. In fact, my sister really wants one! It definitely has off-road intentions so that part might be wasted in your neck of the woods. There is nothing wrong with that if gas consumption isn't a concern.
I suggest two things though. If you tend have rear seat passengers or cargo, try climbing in and out and see what you think in terms of access. Second, take the car into a crowded parking lot and park it between cars and back it up a few times. See if the visibility is acceptable for the daily driving you'll be doing. Good luck in your search!
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Thursday, August 5, 2010
2011 Ford Mustang GT Automatic Test Drive and Overview
A friend of mine who is a very knowledgeable and frequent contributor to the automotive forums recently had the opportunity to rent a new 2011 Mustang GT with the 6-speed automatic. Read below for his fascinating findings and analysis:
____________
Well, I drove (the hell out of) my first 5.0 GT Mustang today. VERY enlightening. Here is what I learned - tips that anybody running mid 12's on up better heed!
CLIFFS NOTES: Race an auto 5.0 from a 25-30mph roll. Preferably 25mph in case he has the optional 3.73 gears. They have a nasty lag from WOT to pulling: 1 1/2 to 2 seconds from pedal slamming to shift nannies off and howling with full power. You want a legit race? Make him manually shift it and hold the gear. If you don't pull him below 70mph, you WILL NOT walk it down. Period. BE WARNED: all kinds of computer nanny interference means a tuned (de-nannied), CAI and catback auto is gonna be one helluva lot faster than a stock one.
Conditions: Victorville, California elevation 2900', temp 97 deg F.
Interior: I'm 6'5" and square: I had trouble fitting into it, even with seat all the way back my knees were only 2" from the dash. Head hit the roof until I lowered seat all the way down, and leaned it back a bit. <<>Driving initial impressions: Strong! Surprisingly reminds me of the LS1 Fbodies in the stiffness of suspension and surprising amount of tire noise that makes it into the cab. I like that, but most don't. Fairly stiff body for a pony car, but could definitely be stiffer. Car feels very short from inside: Having sat in a SS, Challenger, and Charger I would say the GT feels like about 5 to 8' shorter. No kidding.
Power: High revving powerband for sure. If you are a true veteran gearhead you can feel? sense? the VVT working. Still not near enough power below 4k though. Laggy throttle and slow downshifts are annoying to say the least- though expected in any modern car available to the ignorant, crappy driver mod public nowadays.
Transmission and gearing: The 6 speed automatic does a masterful job of hiding the deadspots. Seriously, I did launches from every 5mph incremental speed starting at zero and ending at 90mph. It acts like a virgin closing her legs to your advances at every possible location. Only one dead spot- and it's a doozy: 25-30mph. Not 20-30mph, not 25-31mph, but TWENTY FIVE TO THIRTY MPH. Massive dead spot that totally exposes the low torque engines bottom end lack of power.
This 5.0 is a rental, you know it doesn't have the track pack 3.73 gears. Drop 3-5mph for that probably. Any quick LSx 6spd or A4 will literally put 3-4 cars on an auto 5.0 mustang if you race him from that 25-30mph range.
Other than that? Well, there is one spot around 70mph where it drops down to "only" 4200rpms on the hit. That's it. Legs crossed tight, you are gonna have to take that cherry with brute force if you missed your "sweet spot" low roll starting point!
Dig? Does it surprisingly well: I was able to brake stall the converter up to 2100rpms. No shit, they must have a 2600rpm stall convertor from the factory- or a high STR 2400stall maybe? Due to that high stall, they pull just as hard from a 5mph punch as they do from a dig. Same with 10mph.
And at 20mph? Well, good luck. Pulls like a raped ape on steroids from 20mph. It's almost as hard pulling at 60mph, too: those two speeds you DO NOT want to race a 5.0 GT from!!!!!!
Nannies and torque management: They are on this car like white on rice. VERY VERY restrictive on both not going WOT when you want, to 2 second gear changes, to nannies everywhere that you cannot turn off that are keeping the engine from making power. I can EASILY see this car picking up 5 tenths with a tune and maybe another 5 tenths with a CAI, catback, and maybe tires.
Traction: mine hooked great, but it's 97 deg F outside and they were warm and the engine was down on power. The DA at a dragstrip with those conditions would require an oxygen mask!!! Bringing stall up to just before spinning the tires then dumping the gas barely let out a chirp. Just not enough torque, even with the factory high stall. --- and the high DA. Always keep that in mind while reading this post.
Top speed: honestly, it pulls better past 90mph than my GTO does. Speedo just swept on by 80, 90, 100, 110, and to 120 where I let up like it was on a dyno instead of in the middle of a desert at high noon. Very impressive for a Mustang...or most any other car not sporting 400+ real crank hp. You LS1 guys better have some breathing mods on your cars or these 5.0 'Stangs will "Supra" you.
Handling? Put the same tires on a SS and 5.0 and watch the SS walk away on any but maybe a very very tight track. Maybe the Mustang just needs bigger tires, but I think it's a geometry issue: either way bone stock it only gives the impression of being a great handling car- not the reality.
^^And yes, I can make that distinction whereas most other car guys can't. Ain't braggin, it's just the simple truth: I've spent a lot of time on road courses and in fast, modified cars. The 5.0 has the bones to be a great autocrosses, but not with that current suspension setup. And that damned yaw control nanny has to go! It kicks in at 90% of max lateral when it is just starting to get fun.
Conclusion: Do I think it's a stock 12 second car? Absolutely. Even with the annoying nannies, average drivers on average tracks should knock out 12.9-13.0 times with 2000' or lower DA. Tune, CAI, catback should be low to mid 12's.
Side note: I'm also pretty good at judging the airflow thru an engine. This 5.0 feels like it's fully capable of more power with just a cam change. Reminds me a lot of how I felt the first time I drove a LS1 Camaro- I immediately felt it needed a cam! Same here: expect cams to become a "gotta have" for the track crowd. Expect unported heads to pick up 40-50rwhp IF - and that's a big IF- the longblock can handle another 600rpms. If it can, well, ..... GM and Dodge better buy stock in Jenny Craig. Fast.
_______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
____________
Well, I drove (the hell out of) my first 5.0 GT Mustang today. VERY enlightening. Here is what I learned - tips that anybody running mid 12's on up better heed!
CLIFFS NOTES: Race an auto 5.0 from a 25-30mph roll. Preferably 25mph in case he has the optional 3.73 gears. They have a nasty lag from WOT to pulling: 1 1/2 to 2 seconds from pedal slamming to shift nannies off and howling with full power. You want a legit race? Make him manually shift it and hold the gear. If you don't pull him below 70mph, you WILL NOT walk it down. Period. BE WARNED: all kinds of computer nanny interference means a tuned (de-nannied), CAI and catback auto is gonna be one helluva lot faster than a stock one.
Conditions: Victorville, California elevation 2900', temp 97 deg F.
Interior: I'm 6'5" and square: I had trouble fitting into it, even with seat all the way back my knees were only 2" from the dash. Head hit the roof until I lowered seat all the way down, and leaned it back a bit. <<>Driving initial impressions: Strong! Surprisingly reminds me of the LS1 Fbodies in the stiffness of suspension and surprising amount of tire noise that makes it into the cab. I like that, but most don't. Fairly stiff body for a pony car, but could definitely be stiffer. Car feels very short from inside: Having sat in a SS, Challenger, and Charger I would say the GT feels like about 5 to 8' shorter. No kidding.
Power: High revving powerband for sure. If you are a true veteran gearhead you can feel? sense? the VVT working. Still not near enough power below 4k though. Laggy throttle and slow downshifts are annoying to say the least- though expected in any modern car available to the ignorant, crappy driver mod public nowadays.
Transmission and gearing: The 6 speed automatic does a masterful job of hiding the deadspots. Seriously, I did launches from every 5mph incremental speed starting at zero and ending at 90mph. It acts like a virgin closing her legs to your advances at every possible location. Only one dead spot- and it's a doozy: 25-30mph. Not 20-30mph, not 25-31mph, but TWENTY FIVE TO THIRTY MPH. Massive dead spot that totally exposes the low torque engines bottom end lack of power.
This 5.0 is a rental, you know it doesn't have the track pack 3.73 gears. Drop 3-5mph for that probably. Any quick LSx 6spd or A4 will literally put 3-4 cars on an auto 5.0 mustang if you race him from that 25-30mph range.
Other than that? Well, there is one spot around 70mph where it drops down to "only" 4200rpms on the hit. That's it. Legs crossed tight, you are gonna have to take that cherry with brute force if you missed your "sweet spot" low roll starting point!
Dig? Does it surprisingly well: I was able to brake stall the converter up to 2100rpms. No shit, they must have a 2600rpm stall convertor from the factory- or a high STR 2400stall maybe? Due to that high stall, they pull just as hard from a 5mph punch as they do from a dig. Same with 10mph.
And at 20mph? Well, good luck. Pulls like a raped ape on steroids from 20mph. It's almost as hard pulling at 60mph, too: those two speeds you DO NOT want to race a 5.0 GT from!!!!!!
Nannies and torque management: They are on this car like white on rice. VERY VERY restrictive on both not going WOT when you want, to 2 second gear changes, to nannies everywhere that you cannot turn off that are keeping the engine from making power. I can EASILY see this car picking up 5 tenths with a tune and maybe another 5 tenths with a CAI, catback, and maybe tires.
Traction: mine hooked great, but it's 97 deg F outside and they were warm and the engine was down on power. The DA at a dragstrip with those conditions would require an oxygen mask!!! Bringing stall up to just before spinning the tires then dumping the gas barely let out a chirp. Just not enough torque, even with the factory high stall. --- and the high DA. Always keep that in mind while reading this post.
Top speed: honestly, it pulls better past 90mph than my GTO does. Speedo just swept on by 80, 90, 100, 110, and to 120 where I let up like it was on a dyno instead of in the middle of a desert at high noon. Very impressive for a Mustang...or most any other car not sporting 400+ real crank hp. You LS1 guys better have some breathing mods on your cars or these 5.0 'Stangs will "Supra" you.
Handling? Put the same tires on a SS and 5.0 and watch the SS walk away on any but maybe a very very tight track. Maybe the Mustang just needs bigger tires, but I think it's a geometry issue: either way bone stock it only gives the impression of being a great handling car- not the reality.
^^And yes, I can make that distinction whereas most other car guys can't. Ain't braggin, it's just the simple truth: I've spent a lot of time on road courses and in fast, modified cars. The 5.0 has the bones to be a great autocrosses, but not with that current suspension setup. And that damned yaw control nanny has to go! It kicks in at 90% of max lateral when it is just starting to get fun.
Conclusion: Do I think it's a stock 12 second car? Absolutely. Even with the annoying nannies, average drivers on average tracks should knock out 12.9-13.0 times with 2000' or lower DA. Tune, CAI, catback should be low to mid 12's.
Side note: I'm also pretty good at judging the airflow thru an engine. This 5.0 feels like it's fully capable of more power with just a cam change. Reminds me a lot of how I felt the first time I drove a LS1 Camaro- I immediately felt it needed a cam! Same here: expect cams to become a "gotta have" for the track crowd. Expect unported heads to pick up 40-50rwhp IF - and that's a big IF- the longblock can handle another 600rpms. If it can, well, ..... GM and Dodge better buy stock in Jenny Craig. Fast.
_______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Palo Alto Concours D'elegance 2010
Sunday, June 27th was the forty-fourth annual Palo Alto Concours D’elegance. It was another scorching hot event just like last year, covered in my column from July 3rd, 2009. And again, for $20 prior to the show date, it’s a bargain. Besides that, seeing five street cars I’ve never seen in person is very memorable as well. In my opinion the hot sunshine made the colors even more vibrant.
This year Cadillac and Mercedes Benz were the featured marques which is a great combination. There is a tremendous amount of history between the two, but there were standouts past and present. The Gullwing Mercedes are timeless classics. 1930’s era V-16 Cadillacs have a certain magic about them as do many Concours quality cars from that era. And yes, the first view in person of the new SLS was a treat. It seems small compared to the McLaren parked next to it and the rear styling is a little weak in my opinion.
There were dealers and manufacturers that had their own cars on display too. Sure enough, the CTS Coupe was there with big doors, big butt, and unique styling. I don’t think silver is a good color for it due to the slab sides. The interior is quite nice however.
A white Lotus Evora was also present and looked quite stunning and more polished than the Tesla. A comparison is warranted since the body and chassis is from an extensively re-worked and lengthened Lotus.
Aston Martin had their Rapide 4-door. Dennis Dardinelli, craftsman of dardanellidesign.com exclaimed, “That’s bitchin!” upon approaching it. It really is a stunner with sports car styling. A big V-12 engine producing 470hp with a 6-speed automatic means adequate power. It’s quite a bit slower than the Porsche Panamera Turbo, but looks far better from any angle.
The Fisker Karma stole the show in my opinion. This 4-door plug-in hybrid has curves that are nearly R-rated. It made the Aston Martin Rapide look tame. Interestingly, Henrik Fisker used to be the stylist at Aston Martin and for less than one-half the price of the Rapide, this car could change everything. Its interior nearly matches the exterior. Charging is done via plug-in or by a GM source 2.0 liter 4-cylinder turbo. This thing re-defines 4-door styling and must be seen in person to appreciate. Fisker could sell these as rolling chassis for those wanting internal combustion performance and still do well.
Other highlights include retired race cars in the “Gallery of Greats”, the “Green Cars” exhibit which had only two entrants worthy of the parking on the grass at this event (see above) plus a Tesla Roadster Sport. Other displays included motorcycles with sidecars including a wheelchair bound special, ever-present and gorgeous Ferraris, Emergency and Police vehicles, and a boat display with some wood boats.
This is show is one of the best, covered parking for many, excellent staff and vehicle variety, food and professionalism. The not-so-hot parts were the corral for non-judged cars was particularly weak versus past years, easily eclipsed by the cars for sale. Some of the vehicles were parked too close together, almost discouraging looking inside and behind them. Those views should not be missed either.
Be sure to check out their website for all the information you could possibly want about the show and put the future shows on your calendar.
This year Cadillac and Mercedes Benz were the featured marques which is a great combination. There is a tremendous amount of history between the two, but there were standouts past and present. The Gullwing Mercedes are timeless classics. 1930’s era V-16 Cadillacs have a certain magic about them as do many Concours quality cars from that era. And yes, the first view in person of the new SLS was a treat. It seems small compared to the McLaren parked next to it and the rear styling is a little weak in my opinion.
There were dealers and manufacturers that had their own cars on display too. Sure enough, the CTS Coupe was there with big doors, big butt, and unique styling. I don’t think silver is a good color for it due to the slab sides. The interior is quite nice however.
A white Lotus Evora was also present and looked quite stunning and more polished than the Tesla. A comparison is warranted since the body and chassis is from an extensively re-worked and lengthened Lotus.
Aston Martin had their Rapide 4-door. Dennis Dardinelli, craftsman of dardanellidesign.com exclaimed, “That’s bitchin!” upon approaching it. It really is a stunner with sports car styling. A big V-12 engine producing 470hp with a 6-speed automatic means adequate power. It’s quite a bit slower than the Porsche Panamera Turbo, but looks far better from any angle.
The Fisker Karma stole the show in my opinion. This 4-door plug-in hybrid has curves that are nearly R-rated. It made the Aston Martin Rapide look tame. Interestingly, Henrik Fisker used to be the stylist at Aston Martin and for less than one-half the price of the Rapide, this car could change everything. Its interior nearly matches the exterior. Charging is done via plug-in or by a GM source 2.0 liter 4-cylinder turbo. This thing re-defines 4-door styling and must be seen in person to appreciate. Fisker could sell these as rolling chassis for those wanting internal combustion performance and still do well.
Other highlights include retired race cars in the “Gallery of Greats”, the “Green Cars” exhibit which had only two entrants worthy of the parking on the grass at this event (see above) plus a Tesla Roadster Sport. Other displays included motorcycles with sidecars including a wheelchair bound special, ever-present and gorgeous Ferraris, Emergency and Police vehicles, and a boat display with some wood boats.
This is show is one of the best, covered parking for many, excellent staff and vehicle variety, food and professionalism. The not-so-hot parts were the corral for non-judged cars was particularly weak versus past years, easily eclipsed by the cars for sale. Some of the vehicles were parked too close together, almost discouraging looking inside and behind them. Those views should not be missed either.
Be sure to check out their website for all the information you could possibly want about the show and put the future shows on your calendar.
Nissan GT-R Review and Test Drive - Driving the Beast: Part 2 of 2
Click here for Part 1: Background and Interior Impressions
Driving The Beast:
It whirs and clicks. “Mechanical” is the description that comes to mind over and over. You hear the whirring of the engine and robotic clicks of the dual clutch transmission behind you. I found it pretty cool, conveying its operations although the owner was talking about adding sound insulation.
Almost mind blowing was the way it rockets out of turns with no drama. It was simply uncanny and obscene how early and how hard it could accelerate right after the apex. No hint of oversteer or drift. At full throttle in the less aggressive drive mode setting, the shifts feel like it’s from an automatic transmission.
It’s very large yet the impression given in the turns is that it cannot be rocked when parked if you push it from the side. It’s as if the suspension tolerances are so tight that there is no slop in lateral movement. The ride is quite firm in the sport mode and the pogo effect can be faintly detected but isn’t intrusive. When hitting bumps, it’s as if they are minimized in height and duration and the tire is immediately back to the level surface. Just like any other car, yet seemingly far more responsive.
The steering wheel is small and reminded me of the Lotus Elise I drove with less feedback but very quick ratio. There are plenty of controls on the wheel as well. Despite its feel and not being used to the car and keeping its size in mind, I used the center lane as my reference point, never the right side.
In automatic mode driving in traffic works nicely. Downshifting is fun but the throttle blips are quiet with the stock exhaust and intake. One thing to keep in mind, never manually downshift from 2nd to 1st when coming to a stop – it’s a jerky transition like a sloppily driven manual if timed incorrectly.
The Rest:
Doing a walk around for photos at the summit of Skyline and Highway 9, the owner’s assertion that it’s a “Dude Magnet” was proven. A couple of admirers walked over to check it out and compliment it. After sitting in it and now taking a look at it, it’s like an Infiniti G37 Coupe on growth hormone. Or perhaps steroids, take your pick. It is quite purposeful in design, more militant and not curvy or particularly sexy. It looks good in white and ominous in black.
The G37 Coupe comparison brings up an interesting point. I feel this car should have been sold as an Infiniti. It is more suited to the Infiniti brand. Lexus has race cars, why shouldn’t Infiniti have a performance flagship? The 370Z should carry that banner with Nissan.
Those vents in the middle of the hood are not fake. They actually direct air downward towards the turbos to keep them cool. In fact, even in the heat and fairly aggressive driving the coolant temp stayed around 183 degrees. I found this quite interesting in this day of 200+ degree emission compliant thermostats. And the transmission oil temps never climbed either.
I asked to him to “pop the hatch” assuming the shape dictated a hatchback. I was wrong, it’s a trunk. Oddly shaped, it reminded me of the Camaro. It’s seems rather deep but doesn’t go very far back towards the rear seats.
The GT-R isn’t a sports car although it performs like one. It’s really a Grand Tourer. I would say it makes a better daily driver than the non-twin clutch Porsche 911 Twin Turbo. It is quieter, seems to have more cargo capacity and utilitarian. However it isn’t as intimate or as exotic. The 911 Twin Turbo may not show well vs. the Italian exotics, but it is sexier looking than the GT-R. I would reserve judgment about the dual- clutch 911 TT though. That transmission and the recent suspension revisions would put it back in 1st place in my mind.
So was launch control ever used? No, he has never used launch control. In my estimate, that means consistent low 1.9x 60fts at the drag strip rather than 1.8s. Not really a big deal.
Will it turn a 7:29 at the infamous Nurburgring in Germany? Well, it will definitely beat a non-PDK transmission 911 Twin Turbo. It should be noted that Randy Pobst ran a low 1:40.453 at Laguna Seca when testing with Motor Trend. Compare that to some other cars at Fastlaps.com and the pecking order seems representative.
It’s an amazing car, and perhaps it doesn’t have a soul as some say. What it does have, if one were attribute an organic quality, is personality.
______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Driving The Beast:
It whirs and clicks. “Mechanical” is the description that comes to mind over and over. You hear the whirring of the engine and robotic clicks of the dual clutch transmission behind you. I found it pretty cool, conveying its operations although the owner was talking about adding sound insulation.
Almost mind blowing was the way it rockets out of turns with no drama. It was simply uncanny and obscene how early and how hard it could accelerate right after the apex. No hint of oversteer or drift. At full throttle in the less aggressive drive mode setting, the shifts feel like it’s from an automatic transmission.
It’s very large yet the impression given in the turns is that it cannot be rocked when parked if you push it from the side. It’s as if the suspension tolerances are so tight that there is no slop in lateral movement. The ride is quite firm in the sport mode and the pogo effect can be faintly detected but isn’t intrusive. When hitting bumps, it’s as if they are minimized in height and duration and the tire is immediately back to the level surface. Just like any other car, yet seemingly far more responsive.
The steering wheel is small and reminded me of the Lotus Elise I drove with less feedback but very quick ratio. There are plenty of controls on the wheel as well. Despite its feel and not being used to the car and keeping its size in mind, I used the center lane as my reference point, never the right side.
In automatic mode driving in traffic works nicely. Downshifting is fun but the throttle blips are quiet with the stock exhaust and intake. One thing to keep in mind, never manually downshift from 2nd to 1st when coming to a stop – it’s a jerky transition like a sloppily driven manual if timed incorrectly.
The Rest:
Doing a walk around for photos at the summit of Skyline and Highway 9, the owner’s assertion that it’s a “Dude Magnet” was proven. A couple of admirers walked over to check it out and compliment it. After sitting in it and now taking a look at it, it’s like an Infiniti G37 Coupe on growth hormone. Or perhaps steroids, take your pick. It is quite purposeful in design, more militant and not curvy or particularly sexy. It looks good in white and ominous in black.
The G37 Coupe comparison brings up an interesting point. I feel this car should have been sold as an Infiniti. It is more suited to the Infiniti brand. Lexus has race cars, why shouldn’t Infiniti have a performance flagship? The 370Z should carry that banner with Nissan.
Those vents in the middle of the hood are not fake. They actually direct air downward towards the turbos to keep them cool. In fact, even in the heat and fairly aggressive driving the coolant temp stayed around 183 degrees. I found this quite interesting in this day of 200+ degree emission compliant thermostats. And the transmission oil temps never climbed either.
I asked to him to “pop the hatch” assuming the shape dictated a hatchback. I was wrong, it’s a trunk. Oddly shaped, it reminded me of the Camaro. It’s seems rather deep but doesn’t go very far back towards the rear seats.
The GT-R isn’t a sports car although it performs like one. It’s really a Grand Tourer. I would say it makes a better daily driver than the non-twin clutch Porsche 911 Twin Turbo. It is quieter, seems to have more cargo capacity and utilitarian. However it isn’t as intimate or as exotic. The 911 Twin Turbo may not show well vs. the Italian exotics, but it is sexier looking than the GT-R. I would reserve judgment about the dual- clutch 911 TT though. That transmission and the recent suspension revisions would put it back in 1st place in my mind.
So was launch control ever used? No, he has never used launch control. In my estimate, that means consistent low 1.9x 60fts at the drag strip rather than 1.8s. Not really a big deal.
Will it turn a 7:29 at the infamous Nurburgring in Germany? Well, it will definitely beat a non-PDK transmission 911 Twin Turbo. It should be noted that Randy Pobst ran a low 1:40.453 at Laguna Seca when testing with Motor Trend. Compare that to some other cars at Fastlaps.com and the pecking order seems representative.
It’s an amazing car, and perhaps it doesn’t have a soul as some say. What it does have, if one were attribute an organic quality, is personality.
______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Nissan GT-R Review and Test Drive: Part 1 of 2
Click here for Part 2 of 2: Driving the Beast
There were quite a few surprises driving the awesome and controversial Nissan GT-R. Having the opportunity to drive one on a twisty mountain road favored by motorcyclists was a thrill. It’s very “mechanical”, quite large and my impression more of a competitor to the Audi R8 than the Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Background: This 2010 model has about 2000 miles on it. The MSRP was over $80,000. It features a 6-speed dual clutch paddle-shift rear transaxle. The 3.8 liter twin-turbo V-6 produces 485 hp at 6400rpm and 434 ft. lbs of torque at 3200 rpm. Known for consistent deep 3-second 0-60mph blasts and high 11-second quarter mile times, the biggest controversy was the factory reported Nurburgring time of 7:29, beating far lighter, 600 hp plus cars like the Porsche Carrera GT and Pagani Zonda F.
The owner has had some notable cars in the past and is no stranger to track days. Cars like a track prepped Acura NSX, two E46 BMW M3s, and an ’04 Porsche 911 GT3. Currently besides the Nissan is a ’08 Porsche Cayman. He knows his cars.
Interior Impressions:
The first thing noticed is the deep, very supportive seats although I found myself sitting rather high up; almost oddly so for a performance car. The seats have an intuitive rotating and sliding control for electric motor adjustments. The door armrest and side panel is deeply padded and very comfortable. Looking outward, the visibility is very good, partially due to the high seating position. Even the race car in Speed GT seems to have a very high seating position. However due to the width and design, despite the overall visibility it’s hard to place the outer edge of the car during my brief time with it.
The rear seats are deep, but not a lot of leg room. It’s really more of a 3-seater like many smaller 2+2 coupes. The legroom is behind the passenger but the driver’s seat once adjusted pretty much eliminates a 4th passenger option.
Gauges are always welcome and the driver configurable display is a real treat. Information in the custom configuration set by the owner was showing boost level, engine oil temp, oil pressure, coolant temp, transmission oil temp and transmission oil pressure. It would take time to get used to reading them quickly but it’s great to have that information.
Telescoping steering is intuitively found but the tilt function is not. Believe it or not, a look at the owner’s manual was needed. Turns out the levers are next to each other. Go figure.
Now it was time to drive it, detailed in Part 2 of 2.
______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
There were quite a few surprises driving the awesome and controversial Nissan GT-R. Having the opportunity to drive one on a twisty mountain road favored by motorcyclists was a thrill. It’s very “mechanical”, quite large and my impression more of a competitor to the Audi R8 than the Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Background: This 2010 model has about 2000 miles on it. The MSRP was over $80,000. It features a 6-speed dual clutch paddle-shift rear transaxle. The 3.8 liter twin-turbo V-6 produces 485 hp at 6400rpm and 434 ft. lbs of torque at 3200 rpm. Known for consistent deep 3-second 0-60mph blasts and high 11-second quarter mile times, the biggest controversy was the factory reported Nurburgring time of 7:29, beating far lighter, 600 hp plus cars like the Porsche Carrera GT and Pagani Zonda F.
The owner has had some notable cars in the past and is no stranger to track days. Cars like a track prepped Acura NSX, two E46 BMW M3s, and an ’04 Porsche 911 GT3. Currently besides the Nissan is a ’08 Porsche Cayman. He knows his cars.
Interior Impressions:
The first thing noticed is the deep, very supportive seats although I found myself sitting rather high up; almost oddly so for a performance car. The seats have an intuitive rotating and sliding control for electric motor adjustments. The door armrest and side panel is deeply padded and very comfortable. Looking outward, the visibility is very good, partially due to the high seating position. Even the race car in Speed GT seems to have a very high seating position. However due to the width and design, despite the overall visibility it’s hard to place the outer edge of the car during my brief time with it.
The rear seats are deep, but not a lot of leg room. It’s really more of a 3-seater like many smaller 2+2 coupes. The legroom is behind the passenger but the driver’s seat once adjusted pretty much eliminates a 4th passenger option.
Gauges are always welcome and the driver configurable display is a real treat. Information in the custom configuration set by the owner was showing boost level, engine oil temp, oil pressure, coolant temp, transmission oil temp and transmission oil pressure. It would take time to get used to reading them quickly but it’s great to have that information.
Telescoping steering is intuitively found but the tilt function is not. Believe it or not, a look at the owner’s manual was needed. Turns out the levers are next to each other. Go figure.
Now it was time to drive it, detailed in Part 2 of 2.
______
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Ask Rob About Cars: Lowering A Lifted Truck, Part 2
I saw your article on lifted trucks online. I am about to buy a great used truck, but it is lifted.. and I don't really want it to be. Any ideas on where or how is the best way to lower it again and what that would cost?
- Adam from L.A.
Hello Adam, I had this question asked once before. You can reference my answer from September 23rd, 2009 in the link here.
There are other reasons besides the safety, mileage and courtesy factors. It allows easier access to contents in the truck bed and interior. Also being able to park in your own garage or a public parking garage is nice. Finally, females in skirts and dresses tend not to like climbing in and out of them and that can be critical...
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
- Adam from L.A.
Hello Adam, I had this question asked once before. You can reference my answer from September 23rd, 2009 in the link here.
There are other reasons besides the safety, mileage and courtesy factors. It allows easier access to contents in the truck bed and interior. Also being able to park in your own garage or a public parking garage is nice. Finally, females in skirts and dresses tend not to like climbing in and out of them and that can be critical...
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Monday, June 7, 2010
Ford GT500 - Now It's Truly Legit
The Ford GT500 is now the car it always should have been. A weight loss of 146 lbs as tested by Car & Driver is the biggest reason. A brief review of the revised 2010 gave positive feedback for the revised interior but weight was still my concern. By all accounts in the media the 2010 suspension was much improved vs. the previous year.
The big news now is an aluminum engine block, saving 102lbs vs. the iron mill. This also contributes to a better front/rear weight distribution for improved handling and braking.
At 3751lbs it's still pretty heavy for a 107.1" wheelbase and not very aerodynamic, but what muscle car is? As mentioned, Ford made improvements to the solid rear axle (SRA). I can't say this ideal for handling like a rear independent suspension (IRS), but it is better for the dragstrip.
Although the rear seats are hardly usable, it does offer that degree of practicality a Corvette cannot. Also, it now raises the bar for Chevrolet to come out with the Z/28 Camaro that weighs the same or less than the non-supercharged SS already does.
Of course, with forced induction and upgraded engine cooling, minor modifications net big gains in horsepower. Just a guess but swapping a smaller pulley on the supercharger and tuning would take the horsepower from 550 to around 650. That's simply awesome. I now want one, badly.
MFP6DERJ5JHE
Thursday, June 3, 2010
American LeMans Racing at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca - Part 2
Part 2 of the American LeMans race at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca.
There were 9 races over the weekend in 6 different classes but even if you just attend one, there was much to see and do. The main race is the 3rd longest race in the series and unfortunately even the new date in May vs. October didn't bring much better weather. Although temperatures were bearable in the sun it was quite windy. I know people that stayed home thinking it was going to rain.
Some highlights:
A tribute to racing Corvettes, past and present and serial # 001 2011 commemorative Z-06 in the paddock area.
Walking the starting grid before the main race was a treat, meeting the drivers and seeing the cars up close.
Taking the path up to the corkscrew made for some terrific views and is easier than going straight up. As it turns out, there were more spectators on the hillside than in both grandstands combined. Makes for a great although limited view, louder and protected from the wind. How could you go wrong?
The car corrals were interesting. Ferrari seemed to be missing, BMW looked like a parking lot of sedans, the Porsches were primarily drab colors and the Corvette contingent was quite large again. Acura NSX had a much smaller showing than past years which is inevitable since Honda stopped making sports cars, truly fast ones even longer than that.
The manufacturer displays are always worth a visit. Chevrolet had a great display of a Corvette ZR1 skeleton with the suspension, transaxle and engine. It was the first I've seen such a display and revealed much. It was absolutely fascinating.
The vendor area again had good variety, Piloti shoes has new styles and some leather models that are very cool and classy. Don't forget about the clothing and auto-themed jewelry. There were even purses made from seatbelt straps.
The track souvenir shop has an excellent variety of clothes and styles but I have one problem with much of the items. Despite Mazda's excellent contribution to the track and it's upgrades, I do not want "Mazda" on any of my clothing no matter what I drive unless it's a Mazda. And even then it's debatable. If Ferrari bought the naming rights, what if you drive a Porsche or Corvette? The line has to be drawn somewhere.
Of course, the English beer tent and again the quesadillas from Sundance Southwest Quesadilla and Sausage company deserve special mention. Again.
Got kids? A nice play area and big field of well manicured grass looked especially fun and even inviting for a nap. Yes, a nap is possible at the race track. Those glorious sounds can get you either very excited or lull you too sleep.
The series and the track have put on a first class event. Even the media materials are exceptional and could be offered to the public for sale. However, a six hour race is quite long and while an excellent test for teams and drivers, it's tough on the fans. The beauty is if you stay for only a few hours, there is so much to see and do.
Interestingly the television coverage was scheduled for 2.5 hours on CBS. It was actually 1 hour and while beautifully filmed with various profiles and features, there was a lot of racing action that wasn't shown to the viewing audience.
Links:
Mazda Raceway at Laguna Seca
American LeMans Series results page
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc.? Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
There were 9 races over the weekend in 6 different classes but even if you just attend one, there was much to see and do. The main race is the 3rd longest race in the series and unfortunately even the new date in May vs. October didn't bring much better weather. Although temperatures were bearable in the sun it was quite windy. I know people that stayed home thinking it was going to rain.
Some highlights:
A tribute to racing Corvettes, past and present and serial # 001 2011 commemorative Z-06 in the paddock area.
Walking the starting grid before the main race was a treat, meeting the drivers and seeing the cars up close.
Taking the path up to the corkscrew made for some terrific views and is easier than going straight up. As it turns out, there were more spectators on the hillside than in both grandstands combined. Makes for a great although limited view, louder and protected from the wind. How could you go wrong?
The car corrals were interesting. Ferrari seemed to be missing, BMW looked like a parking lot of sedans, the Porsches were primarily drab colors and the Corvette contingent was quite large again. Acura NSX had a much smaller showing than past years which is inevitable since Honda stopped making sports cars, truly fast ones even longer than that.
The manufacturer displays are always worth a visit. Chevrolet had a great display of a Corvette ZR1 skeleton with the suspension, transaxle and engine. It was the first I've seen such a display and revealed much. It was absolutely fascinating.
The vendor area again had good variety, Piloti shoes has new styles and some leather models that are very cool and classy. Don't forget about the clothing and auto-themed jewelry. There were even purses made from seatbelt straps.
The track souvenir shop has an excellent variety of clothes and styles but I have one problem with much of the items. Despite Mazda's excellent contribution to the track and it's upgrades, I do not want "Mazda" on any of my clothing no matter what I drive unless it's a Mazda. And even then it's debatable. If Ferrari bought the naming rights, what if you drive a Porsche or Corvette? The line has to be drawn somewhere.
Of course, the English beer tent and again the quesadillas from Sundance Southwest Quesadilla and Sausage company deserve special mention. Again.
Got kids? A nice play area and big field of well manicured grass looked especially fun and even inviting for a nap. Yes, a nap is possible at the race track. Those glorious sounds can get you either very excited or lull you too sleep.
The series and the track have put on a first class event. Even the media materials are exceptional and could be offered to the public for sale. However, a six hour race is quite long and while an excellent test for teams and drivers, it's tough on the fans. The beauty is if you stay for only a few hours, there is so much to see and do.
Interestingly the television coverage was scheduled for 2.5 hours on CBS. It was actually 1 hour and while beautifully filmed with various profiles and features, there was a lot of racing action that wasn't shown to the viewing audience.
Links:
Mazda Raceway at Laguna Seca
American LeMans Series results page
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc.? Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Is Tesla the next GM
Recently I had the opportunity to tour Tesla's final assembly and sales location and came away not only impressed but thinking, is this the next GM? Think about the emphass on electric cars. Will a generation or two from now say, "You mean to tell me that your car had flammable liquids stored in it and you had to replenish them every 1 or 2 weeks!?" There is going to be a generation that can't fathom a gasoline powered car any more than kids today never being without cell phones.
There will be a point where virtually every family will have a hybrid or electric vehicle in the garage and Tesla seems to be leading the way with a battery-only vehicle for the street.
My question was always, why a sports car? As it was explained to me, I realized what a clever idea it was. Make it a halo car that gets a lot of attention, limited availability and light enough that with the battery power available the performance compares decently with other cars in the same $100k price range. Granted it isn't a quarter-mile monster nor a road circuit track star, but it is quite quick in the more-or-less legal speed ranges. Also, being a niche two-seater means it isn't improperly perceived as the final break from our dependence on oil. Get the attention, establish credentials, raise funds, research, develop and then take what you've learned and earned to establish a mass-appeal, obtainable 4-door. Brilliant.
The motor is made in Taiwan. The chassis comes from Lotus in England where it is stretched and heavily modified to accommodate the battery pack. The body and paintwork is done by a company called in France. The battery pack which consists of over 4,000 lithium-ion cells, is made in San Carlos, CA. Final assembly occurs at the "dealership" in Menlo Park, CA.
Granted this can be an expensive build process but right now it is passed on to the buying public. This is a great example of global outsourcing to keep overhead low and use the best available sources for a final product.
Edit: Ah yes, Tesla is still ahead of the pack, selling hundreds of thousands of EVs globally, making their fans ecstatic and driving critics nuts. Great commuter cars.
Edit: Ah yes, Tesla is still ahead of the pack, selling hundreds of thousands of EVs globally, making their fans ecstatic and driving critics nuts. Great commuter cars.
American LeMans Racing at Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca - Racing Coverage
Six hours of triple digit speeds wasn't the only story this past weekend on the Monterey Peninsula. Anticipating warmer weather this May vs. past races in October, it was still a little cold and windy. A hardcore race fan may watch the entire 6-hour race, but there is so much more going on the entire weekend. Be sure to check out Part 2 regarding all the other events taking place.
RACE RESULTS:
Most notable was the Highcroft Racing Acura HPD ARX-01C finishing in first place after starting at the back of the grid. It turned it's fastest time on lap 5 with a 1:14.441. Witnessing this lap in the grandstands at turn 4, my buddy and I looked at each other as the car flew by us, knowing were watching something special. This is the fastest turn and Acura states up to 131mph!
The Acura battled the Mazda powered Lola B09 86 throughout the race, which interestingly qualified 2 seconds quicker. Unfortunately the oil filter blew with only 24 minutes remaining, causing the Lola to withdraw, leaving the Acura to finish 7 laps ahead of the non-factory Porsche RS Spyder.
In the LMPC class featuring slightly slower prototypes saw the Oreca FLM 09 taking 3rd overall, only one lap ahead of the Oreca FLM 09 featuring local Los Gatos resident Tom Sutherland, son of accomplished racer Rick Sutherland. Attrition meant the remaining prototype cars to be finished before the end of the race.
The GT class featuring the more identifiable Porsches, Ferraris, Corvettes and a Jaguar was the source of more consistent battles with Patrick Long in the Porsche 911 RSR passing Joey Hand in the Rahal/Letterman (yes, that Letterman) BMW M3 GT and then finally winning by less than four-tenths of a second! Roughly 3 seconds behind was the Corvette "ZR1" finishing 3rd, cleanly this time vs. last October.
I put "ZR1" in quotes because the body is based on the current Corvette ZR1 but the powertrain is a 5.3 liter normally aspirated V-8, not a supercharged 6.2 liter. However, it still sounds as thunderous as the big 427s from the currently retired GT1 class.
The Jaguar looked sharp but unfortunately finished last due to a mechanical problem. The best sounding car was the Ford GT which just ripped and snarled down the track but just was competitive. Sadly, the field seemed smaller this year when previous series competitors such as the Ford powered Panoz and the Dodge Viper didn't show.
In the GTC class, a clever way to boost car count, the Porsche GT3 Cup cars had some great racing with Black Swan Racing taking their first win. These cars, also on slicks, turn 1:27s and 1:28s which now makes them faster than the Speed GT series which was greatly missed this weekend due to a conflict in race schedules.
Unfortunately there were 10 caution periods due to cars going off track for a total of 42 laps of 237 completed by the winning Acura. Even though improvements have been made to the track, watching other events suggests the runoff area is just too short for less restrictive. Another change at the track is a 3-sided big screen on top of the scoring tower, a nice addition to see action you normally miss from various vantage points.
See part 2 for further highlights of the event weekend.
____________
Links:
Mazda Raceway at Laguna Seca
American LeMans Series results page
_____
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc.? Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Thursday, May 20, 2010
California Mille 2010 in Downtown San Francisco
Last weekend marked the beginning of the 20th Anniversary of the California Mille. A 1,000 mile driving and social event for pre-1958 cars throughout Northern California. In the tradition of the Mille Miglia in Italy, it is more than just classics being driven around with a $5,800 entry fee. For the public, it is essentially a free Concours D'elegance at the Fairmont Hotel at Nob Hill in San Francisco.
Participant cars are parked in front of the hotel and other gorgeous classics on the street. The variety and caliber of the cars is extraordinary. As a matter of fact, cars from the Palo Alto Concours were present as well.
The beauty of event is these cars are not sitting in a garage undriven and unappreciated except by a few. They are gorgeous, mostly in excellent condition being driven hundreds of miles a day. Many of them do not have air conditioning, radios or other modern comforts. Somewhat like all the benefits and detriments of motorcycling come to think of it. In some cases, about the same amount of storage space.
The event is primarily for the owners to enjoy their cars, venues and driving experience. And for the public, who would normally pay $25 to $150 to see such classics gathered in one place minus the trailer queens and storage princesses, it is a special treat.
Club Auto Sport's Art and Autos Event
Club Auto Sport in San Jose, California, the premier car condominium and club also hosts various automotive themed events throughout the year. On Friday, March 5th, the Art and Autos event was a, “An Exhibit of Fine Automotive Art and Auto Design.”
The San Francisco Academy of Art Industrial Design School presented several futuristic automotive designs with models, story boards and illustrations. The director of the industrial design department, Tom Matano was the special guest. Known as the “The Father of the Miata sports car design”, Mr. Matano was the General Manager of Mazda Design and held other prominent positions within the company.
Besides artwork on display, the automobiles are always pleasant to look at that are being offered by Premier Auto Sales. The condos that are open to public view offer fascinating views of collections, automobiles and artwork. Below is the press release from Club Auto Sport.
Be sure to check out the free Showoff Saturdays car shows including today as well as the Bulldogs, Bentleys, Bangers and Beatles event on Saturday, May 8th from 9am – 4pm at Club Auto Sport!
Pablo Picasso once said “Painting is just another way of keeping a diary” Club Auto Sport proudly presents some of the finest diaries of automotive fine art, artists and auto designs on Friday evening March 5th. Works of art from world famous racing photographers and artists including Bill Patterson, will be on display.
San Francisco's Academy of Art Industrial Design School will be showcasing a number of futuristic, automotive designs. Special guest Tom Matano, director of the industrial design department, also know as "the father of the Miata sports car design" will be on hand as well. San Jose State will rev up the school’s first ever hybrid racing car design. Add to or start your automotive art collection. All art on display will be for sale. Stake your claim to some great art during the silent auction.
2010 Audi S4: Undisclosed Extra Horsepower?
It's great when sedans crack the 12 second quarter mile mark at 108mph or more. But when they weigh 4,000lbs and are rated at 333hp, something doesn't add up. In this case, the S4 seems to be making approximately 70 horsepower more than advertised. Consider the following test results:
Road & Track May 2010: 12.9 seconds @ 108.6 mph
Road & Track January 2010: 13.2 seconds @ 106.8 mph
Car & Driver October 2009: 13.4 seconds @ 106 mph
With very aggressive gearing and AWD like the Porsche Panamera this would be believable from a 333hp 2-ton sedan. But these times have been achieved with 6-speed manual cars. Looking back to the 420hp RS4 that was also around 4,000lbs, this matches pretty well. Audi isn't lying about the weight either. The Road & Track car weighed in at 4,010lbs. A really quick pig, if you will.
At 333hp, an all-wheel drive car needs to weigh around 3,300lbs to achieve those speeds. There is more parasitic loss with AWD vs. two-wheel drive powertrain layout. Is Audi purposefully underrating the car? Or does cool weather and a cool motor with direct injection make a lot more horsepower than if fully warmed up at normal operating temperatures?
This has happened in the past and perhaps forced induction motors are more susceptible to horsepower variations in temperature. If intentional, it's a nice benefit for the owners. But if the ratings creep up during the model run, what changes warrant it?
There is a 13.0 @ 107mph on dragtimes.com that is attributed to a private party. Hopefully this means these are not magazine "ringers" with aggressive tunes or smaller-than-stock supercharger pulleys creating more boost. Many including myself think Nissan did this with the pre-production GT-Rs that were much quicker than those sold in the showrooms. And of course, the Nurburgring times are questionable for any 3800+lbs, 480hp car. You can't defy physics. Audi isn't making any wild claims though. Except of course the low horsepower rating...
It's in Audi's best interest to disclose the horsepower variance. And I would love to see if the 7-speed DCT transmission can do better and if it has more aggressive gearing. Interestingly Audi lists the weight of the manual transmission car at 3847lbs, 77lbs less than the 7-speed. They are not fibbing that the weight is over 3800lbs, that's for sure.
Audi's supercharged S4 eclipses the previous generation RS4 and is beating the competition. If driving it is anything like my experience from A5 review from 1//17/10, it's awesome. Not bad from "only" 333hp, right? Oink oink!
NASCAR Reinstatement Outrages Race Fans
A family member of NASCAR 'royalty" was reinstated by the Grand-Am series after traffic and drug charges against him were dropped due to a "jurisdictional technicality." What was observed and found is the following: Street racing, running a red light, swerving (okay, reckless driving), DUI and cocaine possession.
J.C. France is the grandson of NASCAR founder Bill France. He is a race car driver in the NASCAR owned Grand-Am Road Racing series, best known for the 24 Hours of Daytona. His father founded the Grand-Am series. Early on October 8th, 2009 he was observed racing his 2007 Lamborghini against a Porsche Cayenne that is owned by his roommate, also "connected" with NASCAR and had similar charges. I wonder what they would have found at the home they share?
France is quoted as saying the following at the scene to an officer: "No, this is a mistake for you. I'm a France, we own this city." A real class act and an ambassador for the sport. Unfortunately, this statement seems to ring true.
Whether jurisdictional or not, there is no denying the guilt of J.C. France and his stupidity. And just as bad, the sanctioning body just turned the other cheek after making an example of another driver. The next day, NASCAR issued this statement, "Grand-Am has issued a penalty notice and suspended JC indefinitely from all competition for actions detrimental to racing. The penalty is not appealable. JC is being treated like any other competitor. His suspension is immediate and indefinite." Yeah, until charges are dropped. What a joke.
Drugs are not funny, cool or an edgy lifestyle for the rich. Financing mass murder, assassinations and terrorism is totally unacceptable. This is a slap in the face of law abiding race car drivers, citizens and honest law enforcement officers and the judicial system.
A real shame because the Grand-Am series is a legitimate and interesting road racing series with excellent manufacturer participation. The teams and members that race deserve recognition. The owners simply deserve scorn.
Check out the comments on Autoweekracing.com in the Grand-Am section.
J.C. France is the grandson of NASCAR founder Bill France. He is a race car driver in the NASCAR owned Grand-Am Road Racing series, best known for the 24 Hours of Daytona. His father founded the Grand-Am series. Early on October 8th, 2009 he was observed racing his 2007 Lamborghini against a Porsche Cayenne that is owned by his roommate, also "connected" with NASCAR and had similar charges. I wonder what they would have found at the home they share?
France is quoted as saying the following at the scene to an officer: "No, this is a mistake for you. I'm a France, we own this city." A real class act and an ambassador for the sport. Unfortunately, this statement seems to ring true.
Whether jurisdictional or not, there is no denying the guilt of J.C. France and his stupidity. And just as bad, the sanctioning body just turned the other cheek after making an example of another driver. The next day, NASCAR issued this statement, "Grand-Am has issued a penalty notice and suspended JC indefinitely from all competition for actions detrimental to racing. The penalty is not appealable. JC is being treated like any other competitor. His suspension is immediate and indefinite." Yeah, until charges are dropped. What a joke.
Drugs are not funny, cool or an edgy lifestyle for the rich. Financing mass murder, assassinations and terrorism is totally unacceptable. This is a slap in the face of law abiding race car drivers, citizens and honest law enforcement officers and the judicial system.
A real shame because the Grand-Am series is a legitimate and interesting road racing series with excellent manufacturer participation. The teams and members that race deserve recognition. The owners simply deserve scorn.
Check out the comments on Autoweekracing.com in the Grand-Am section.
2011 Mustang Upgrades: Ask Rob About Cars
Q: What will be the upgrades for the 2011 Mustang? - John H., Los Gatos, CA
A: John, the 2011 Mustang has significant engine horsepower improvements that vault it into top contention for both the V-6 and V-8 models.
The 2010 model already saw an upgraded interior commented on here and the '10 GT has a suspension universally liked by those who have driven due to improved handling despite the archaic solid rear axle. Initial tests also show the braking to be excellent, not something the Mustang has been known for in the past.
The V-6 model drops the ancient 4.0 liter motor for a modern 3.7 with dual overhead cams and variable valve timing and producing 305hp with 87 octane. Recent magazine tests have this car has a high-13 second quarter mile machine with a 29mph highway rating. This is a better car all around than the 2010 GT. Read more about it here with stats and specs.
The big news is the 5.0 liter V-8 called the "Coyote" motor found in the GT model. Now making 412hp, it's now the best bang for the buck in the sub-Corvette and GT500 world. A superbly built motor with internals ready for supercharging or turbocharging, the Mustang is back on top. A 26mpg rating means no mileage penalty despite being capable of 12 second timeslips at the track.
Ford states this is the V-6 first 300hp production car to achieve 30mpg. Finally added is either a 6-speed manual transmission and a 6-speed automatic to both models along with optional equipment packages depending upon intended or desired use. Rear axle ratios, wheel size, and a Brembo brake option are examples. Multiple revisions also include areas such as the suspension, electric power steering instead of a power and mileage rubbing belt.
The Camaro makes more power but is heavier and the Challenger is much heavier and larger. While all three are very capable cars, in my opinion the Mustang is the better track car off the showroom floor, whether it's the dragstrip or the road circuit. Based on what is being reported, the car is now world class among the competition.
Read more about the Mustang GT with stats and specs in a March 2010 Car & Driver article.
________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
2010 Chevrolet Camaro Pace Car Is Wrong
It's time for a change in the monotany of the Indy 500 pace cars. Not only that, GM does strange marketing moves. Repeating the Camaro for 2010 as the "pace car" which means extra stickers and badging like the silly Bumblebee, and it's again handicapped with the lower horsepower rated automatic transmission. Besides that, why is it brand dominated? Besides greed, this isn't about the fine Camaro, it's about relevance.
The IndyCar series currently has seven drivers from the United States of the thirty listed. Not that this is a bad thing, but the only engine used in these cars is from Honda. That's right, Honda. Since Honda doesn't make a performance car any longer (S2000 and the NSX are dead) the pace car, if Honda powered should either be an Acura flagship or a motorcycle like the CBR1000RR or VRF1200F.
Another idea, besides the greed oriented bidding process is to have different brands by judging. A how about a performance car of the year by a vote? Or the pace car of choice by the previous years race winner or previous year series champion. Decals don't make the car either. But having an SUV like the Oldsmobile Bravada in 2001 was a joke.
Another laugh was the Chevrolet SSR in 2003. Basically an overweight, poor selling concept vehicle with little purpose, the long overdue Mustang Cobra would have been far more appropriate. Corvettes have had a too long of a run and skipped the ZR1 for some odd reason. The Dodge Viper has also been missing a long, long time. After all, the Viper ACR is now the king of the track until perhas the Ferrari 599 GTO comes along at takes the crown.
While I'm on this soapbox, forget the 2008 E85 fueled Corvette. E85 doesn't produce the same power as gasoline and produces less miles per gallon. The "Green" racing was attempted at the highest level in Formula 1 and it was dropped. It's just an exercise in marketing. Higher performance breeds greater efficiency anyway.
A website for Indy pace cars is here with some interesting models over the years. But now it's time to spice it up with some variety and no more consecutive year model repeats unless it's something significant. And GM, not a slower version, please.
________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc. Reach me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Toyota Owed an Apology by Consumer Reports
And from the mainstream media as well. Enough is enough, now they are being picked on. Toyota has faulty accelerator pedals and floor mats that are being recalled, that has been established and explained in my article here. What must first be clarified is that the problems caused unintended continued acceleration, not unintended acceleration. The pedals did not apply themselves. Now Consumer Reports gives a "Don't Buy: Safety Risk" because the stability control on two different 2010 Lexus GX 460 SUVs didn't activate at an acceptable level during intended induced oversteer (fishtailing). But no rollover!
CR tries to put this in perspective by stating, "No other SUV in recent years slid out as far as the GX 460". Allow me to put this in real world perspective, "Millions of vehicles on the road don't have stability control at all." Whether this is a sensor calibration or software issue, it doesn't matter. It's good to bring it to Toyota's attention, but it does not merit a "Don't Buy" rating. Not in the slightest. Oh, by the way, Toyota didn't encounter the problem during the vehicle development. And oddly, CR didn't have the problem with the Toyota 4Runner on the same platform.
It's bad enough there are calls to 911 instead of taking proper steps like shifting into neutral while continuously applying the brakes and then turning off the car. Now an organization that has been discredited in the past has done it again. I've written about trucks that have been lifted beyond the stock height that should be lowered, but this is an abomination in the opposite direction.
The bottom line is any vehicle can flip over during a high speed maneuver and striking an object. Apparently CR discovered a Lexus SUV can be drifted. Now that is an SUV that is fun to drive.
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
CR tries to put this in perspective by stating, "No other SUV in recent years slid out as far as the GX 460". Allow me to put this in real world perspective, "Millions of vehicles on the road don't have stability control at all." Whether this is a sensor calibration or software issue, it doesn't matter. It's good to bring it to Toyota's attention, but it does not merit a "Don't Buy" rating. Not in the slightest. Oh, by the way, Toyota didn't encounter the problem during the vehicle development. And oddly, CR didn't have the problem with the Toyota 4Runner on the same platform.
It's bad enough there are calls to 911 instead of taking proper steps like shifting into neutral while continuously applying the brakes and then turning off the car. Now an organization that has been discredited in the past has done it again. I've written about trucks that have been lifted beyond the stock height that should be lowered, but this is an abomination in the opposite direction.
The bottom line is any vehicle can flip over during a high speed maneuver and striking an object. Apparently CR discovered a Lexus SUV can be drifted. Now that is an SUV that is fun to drive.
___________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Ultima GTR - Building the Street-Legal Race Car
Part one is building of the Ultima GTR. Part two will be a test ride review.
The Ultima GTR is very special vehicle. Essentially a tube-frame race car that happens to be street legal, it's a kit that must be assembled. However the end result is very impressive. Take a look at their website and see for yourself. In this case, Chris Julian, a brilliant medical device inventor with over 20 patents is making modifications and refinements during the over 3 year build process while running his company, Ridge Medical, Inc. And the good news it's almost done!
The car is available as a kit for $41,000 which includes free shipping via boat from the United Kingdom. A rolling chassis is $89,000 but still needs an engine. In this case, a 505 horsepower Corvette Z-06 motor was found, still in the crate on Ebay. An ideal powerplant due to it's light weight, power and dry sump lubrication system for a low center of gravity. The rebuilt transmission is from a 1980's era Porsche Turbo which will handle the power and package nicely in the rear of the car. At a target weight of 2,200 lbs, it's power to weight ratio is simply incredible when most exotics are over 3,000lbs.
The most noticeable, and beautiful of the custom modifications is the "bundle of snakes" exhaust headers designed by the owner. Check out the video, they make for a nice exotic sound you usually only hear at historic races. This fabrication was one of the biggest challenges. Check out the slidehow of the various enhancements.
There are other quite clever modifications as well. Knowing how lousy the roads are in Northern California, not to mention driveway curbs and the like, ground clearance would be an issue at a stock 3.5". Suspension mounting brackets with remotely activated hydraulic rams extend the ride height 2" to overcome obstacles. Low speed ride height adjustment is rare even among exotics.
A fuel surge tank was added to assure properly fuel pressure during high g-force loads. An integrated datalogger was added with multiple inputs and programmability. Currently set up for fuel and oil pressure, brake temperature, engine bay temperature and air pressure under the car all with alarms in case a pre-determined threshold is reached. Fire suppression is also on this car.
It will have air conditioning, a defroster and numerous revisions to the interior including a status display. The color is a gel coat which is embedded in the fiberglass body itself which makes rock chips less conspicuous. Another step in weight reduction would be a full carbon fiber body but unfortunately is no longer offered.
The Chris's description of the kit car market is "buyer beware" but was very impressed with the build quality of the Ultima. But like any small volume manufacturer or kit car, there will be challenges in building and maintaining. The suspension must be partially disassembled to change the battery. The side pods are not designed to be easily removed despite the tube frame design. Changing the belts near the bulkhead will also pose a challenge. Keep in mind this is meant for track days and weekends, not fifteen thousand miles per year as a daily driver.
Due to the tuning required, it is not equipped with anti-lock brakes nor traction control. Forget airbags. Not dissimilar to a race car. No driver's aids, no electronic interference. More of a pure track weapon than the Dodge Viper ACR. However, less expensive but more pride in terms of labor, assembly and personalization than the new Viper ACR-X, prior generation known as the Competition Coupe.
The Ultima represents something that no longer exists from a volume manufacturer: A lightweight street car. A tube frame chassis is also virtually non-existent, now carbon fiber at a much higher cost. Electronic nannies are taking over, stability control required in 2012. This is a race car, lightweight, powerful, and just happens to be street legal. It's the ultimate track day car.
Special Mentions:
Incredibly resourceful and clever, Chris sites his father and late uncle as influences starting with their drag racing history from the 50's and 60's.
The final frame welding and finishing before powder coat was done by Thomas Chilcote Fabrication- Tommy Jr. and the late Tom Sr. Beautiful work but unfortunately the company no longer exists.
Check out the interior photos of the quality leather work done by Bascom Upholstery with special mention to John and Randy.
Lawrence Farmer was also cited as a great inspiration and reported to be one of the best race fabricators in the business and knows pretty much every historic racer/owner in the business. Additionally he's built at least a half dozen GTR's including his "Miller Racing" Ultima. Lawrence can be contacted by anyone interested in building an Ultima at (408) 483-9085
Piston Heads UK automotive forum
Building and Fabrication:
"Solid Works" is the CADD software used to model the interior, suspension, headers, and many of the 100+ custom components on the car.
"Dimension" is the manufacturer of the fused deposition modeling system (FDM) that was used to mock up many of the interior pieces
A demo copy of software from "Advantage CFD" was used to study the ground effects.
HAAS CNC is the manufacturer of the automated machining center owned by the builder and used for many of the fabricated components.
Stay tuned for Part 2 when the build is complete and the Ultima GTR is on the road.
_________________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
The Ultima GTR is very special vehicle. Essentially a tube-frame race car that happens to be street legal, it's a kit that must be assembled. However the end result is very impressive. Take a look at their website and see for yourself. In this case, Chris Julian, a brilliant medical device inventor with over 20 patents is making modifications and refinements during the over 3 year build process while running his company, Ridge Medical, Inc. And the good news it's almost done!
The car is available as a kit for $41,000 which includes free shipping via boat from the United Kingdom. A rolling chassis is $89,000 but still needs an engine. In this case, a 505 horsepower Corvette Z-06 motor was found, still in the crate on Ebay. An ideal powerplant due to it's light weight, power and dry sump lubrication system for a low center of gravity. The rebuilt transmission is from a 1980's era Porsche Turbo which will handle the power and package nicely in the rear of the car. At a target weight of 2,200 lbs, it's power to weight ratio is simply incredible when most exotics are over 3,000lbs.
The most noticeable, and beautiful of the custom modifications is the "bundle of snakes" exhaust headers designed by the owner. Check out the video, they make for a nice exotic sound you usually only hear at historic races. This fabrication was one of the biggest challenges. Check out the slidehow of the various enhancements.
There are other quite clever modifications as well. Knowing how lousy the roads are in Northern California, not to mention driveway curbs and the like, ground clearance would be an issue at a stock 3.5". Suspension mounting brackets with remotely activated hydraulic rams extend the ride height 2" to overcome obstacles. Low speed ride height adjustment is rare even among exotics.
A fuel surge tank was added to assure properly fuel pressure during high g-force loads. An integrated datalogger was added with multiple inputs and programmability. Currently set up for fuel and oil pressure, brake temperature, engine bay temperature and air pressure under the car all with alarms in case a pre-determined threshold is reached. Fire suppression is also on this car.
It will have air conditioning, a defroster and numerous revisions to the interior including a status display. The color is a gel coat which is embedded in the fiberglass body itself which makes rock chips less conspicuous. Another step in weight reduction would be a full carbon fiber body but unfortunately is no longer offered.
The Chris's description of the kit car market is "buyer beware" but was very impressed with the build quality of the Ultima. But like any small volume manufacturer or kit car, there will be challenges in building and maintaining. The suspension must be partially disassembled to change the battery. The side pods are not designed to be easily removed despite the tube frame design. Changing the belts near the bulkhead will also pose a challenge. Keep in mind this is meant for track days and weekends, not fifteen thousand miles per year as a daily driver.
Due to the tuning required, it is not equipped with anti-lock brakes nor traction control. Forget airbags. Not dissimilar to a race car. No driver's aids, no electronic interference. More of a pure track weapon than the Dodge Viper ACR. However, less expensive but more pride in terms of labor, assembly and personalization than the new Viper ACR-X, prior generation known as the Competition Coupe.
The Ultima represents something that no longer exists from a volume manufacturer: A lightweight street car. A tube frame chassis is also virtually non-existent, now carbon fiber at a much higher cost. Electronic nannies are taking over, stability control required in 2012. This is a race car, lightweight, powerful, and just happens to be street legal. It's the ultimate track day car.
Special Mentions:
Incredibly resourceful and clever, Chris sites his father and late uncle as influences starting with their drag racing history from the 50's and 60's.
The final frame welding and finishing before powder coat was done by Thomas Chilcote Fabrication- Tommy Jr. and the late Tom Sr. Beautiful work but unfortunately the company no longer exists.
Check out the interior photos of the quality leather work done by Bascom Upholstery with special mention to John and Randy.
Lawrence Farmer was also cited as a great inspiration and reported to be one of the best race fabricators in the business and knows pretty much every historic racer/owner in the business. Additionally he's built at least a half dozen GTR's including his "Miller Racing" Ultima. Lawrence can be contacted by anyone interested in building an Ultima at (408) 483-9085
Piston Heads UK automotive forum
Building and Fabrication:
"Solid Works" is the CADD software used to model the interior, suspension, headers, and many of the 100+ custom components on the car.
"Dimension" is the manufacturer of the fused deposition modeling system (FDM) that was used to mock up many of the interior pieces
A demo copy of software from "Advantage CFD" was used to study the ground effects.
HAAS CNC is the manufacturer of the automated machining center owned by the builder and used for many of the fabricated components.
Stay tuned for Part 2 when the build is complete and the Ultima GTR is on the road.
_________________
Have a question about cars you would like answered? Want to know about performance, racing, modifying, shopping, makes, models, events, etc? Ask me here: AskRobAboutCars@gmail.com and I'll do my best to answer your question and publish it here on Examiner.com!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)